TypeScript – Desarrolladores
¿Buscas expertos en TypeScript? Explora nuestro catálogo de las mejores empresas y freelancers de TI especializados en el desarrollo de TypeScript. Encuentra el proveedor adecuado para tu proyecto hoy.
ITFB es una empresa rusa de TI. Desarrollamos e implantamos software.
- Proyecto mín.
- $3k+
Cascais · Desde 2016 · 11-50 empleados
We Build Products That Don’t Just Work — They Perform From MVPs to full-scale platforms — we craft software driven by real business metrics
- Proyecto mín.
- $5k+
- Tarifa por hora
- $40–$65/h
En ITSpecial creamos software y sitios web atractivos para nuestros clientes. Nuestros clientes son empresas rusas y extranjeras.....
- Proyecto mín.
- $10k+
Desde 2025 · 1-10 empleados
Somos un equipo joven con la sangre hirviendo, dispuesto a hacer los mejores proyectos y exprimir al máximo....
- Proyecto mín.
- $100+
Nuestra empresa está especializada en el desarrollo profesional de páginas Web y ha desarrollado a lo largo de los años ...
- Proyecto mín.
- $3k+
- Proyecto mín.
- $10k+
Estamos especializados en productos web, como desarrollo de sitios web, automatización de tareas en línea...
- Proyecto mín.
- $3k+
Before you shortlist anyone
All calculatorsThe short answer
339 TypeScript companies are listed. 68% publish a minimum project budget; the median floor is $10k. Most work starts in the $10–20k range. Median published rate is $25/hr across 17 companies.
Best supplied: EE.UU. (55) · India (38) · Polonia (18)
Recalculated 2026-10-20 from live profiles.
What it costs, by country
Each cell counts companies whose published minimum project budget falls in that band. Only countries with at least 5 listed companies appear.
| Country | under $3k | $3–10k | $10–20k | $20–30k | $30k+ | Median rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EE.UU.55Widest choice | 1 | 9 | 12 | 8 | 15 | — |
| India38 | — | 8 | 4 | 4 | 4 | — |
| Polonia18 | — | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4 | — |
| Ucrania16 | — | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 | — |
| Reino Unido8 | — | 1 | 3 | 2 | — | — |
| Rumanía5 | — | 2 | 1 | — | — | — |
How this table is built
- Figures are minimum project budgets companies publish on their own profiles — the floor below which they decline work, not the price of a finished project.
- USD only. Companies quote in six currencies and averaging across them produces a number nobody charges.
- Budgets outside $300–$2,000,000 and rates outside $5–$500/hr are dropped as data-entry errors.
- A country needs 5 listed companies for a row, and 5 published rates before a median rate is shown.
What will your budget reach?
Move the slider. Every figure below is a count of companies whose published minimum project budget sits at or under that amount.
68 of 232 companies (29%) take projects at this size.
Where the entry thresholds sit
- under $3k
- 7
- $3–10k
- 61
- $10–20k
- 62
- $20–30k
- 50
- $30k+
- 52
Goes furthest in EE.UU. — 10 companies
This says who will engage, not what your scope should cost. A budget that reaches most of the market still buys very different things depending on what you are building.
Who is focused, and who has proved it
Horizontal: how concentrated a company is on TypeScript. Vertical: how much checkable evidence stands behind it. 59 of 339 companies are plotted — the rest have fewer than 2 evidence signals, so placing them would be guesswork.
- SoftMediaLabLeaders
- CSSChopperLeaders
- DashBouquet DevelopmentLeaders
- ElinextLeaders
- AnadeaLeaders
- RubyGarageLeaders
How a company is placed
- Focus is the inverse of how many categories a company claims, blended with the share of its portfolio tagged with this one. A firm listing three technologies is concentrated; a firm listing forty also appears here.
- Proven delivery adds published reviews (to 20), portfolio projects (to 25), Ahrefs Domain Rating (to 60) and years listed (to 10). Each is capped so no single signal carries a company to the top.
- Positions are relative to the other companies on this page: the median company sits at the centre of each axis, so a quadrant boundary means "ahead of half the companies listed here". Raw scores are in each bubble's tooltip.
- Deliberately excluded: the star rating, which sits in too narrow a band to separate anyone; the editorial rank, which is a hand-assigned sort weight; and paid verification, which does not move anything on this chart.
- Leaders:
- Concentrated on this work and with the record to show for it.
- Specialists:
- This is most of what they do, but the public evidence is still thin.
- Established generalists:
- A substantial track record, spread across many categories.
- Emerging:
- Building both focus and evidence.
Opiniones de clientes sobre TypeScript
Anadea
WeTarget
Real professionals! Absolutely recommend WeTarget Agency.
Futuro Studio
Great team!
Proyectos de portfolio
Por qué confiar en Wadline
Wadline es una plataforma confiable para encontrar empresas y agencias de TI. Ayudamos a las empresas a tomar decisiones informadas a través de reseñas verificadas e información transparente.
Reseñas de clientes verificadas
Cada reseña en Wadline pasa por verificación. Confirmamos la autenticidad de los comentarios de los clientes verificando los detalles del proyecto, los plazos y los resultados.
Rankings basados en datos
Nuestros rankings de empresas se basan en datos. Cada empresa se evalúa según su experiencia, portafolio y satisfacción del cliente.
Alcance global
Wadline conecta empresas de todo el mundo con socios tecnológicos confiables. Nuestra plataforma presenta empresas de múltiples países.
Transparencia total
Desde reseñas verificadas y portafolios hasta servicios y precios, Wadline proporciona una visión completa de cada empresa para tomar decisiones informadas.
Evaluamos a los proveedores de servicios utilizando una metodología estructurada que combina entrevistas con clientes, análisis de portafolio y evaluación de presencia en el mercado.
Conozca nuestra metodología →Explorar con IA
Obtenga un resumen con IA de las mejores empresas en esta categoría. Haga clic en cualquier servicio para analizar esta página.